December 28, 2009

Appelate Court affirms trial court ruling that statute of limitaions had run

H.P. LARGE, and TERRANCE R. CRAIG, d/b/a GREENFIELD LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, v. GREENE COUNTY, TENNESSEE (Tenn. Ct. App. December 28, 2009)

Plaintiffs alleged that defendant had constructed a bridge over Lick Creek which was adjacent to their property, and the bridge had caused their property to repeatedly flood. They further alleged that they were entitled to recover damages under the theory that the County maintained a temporary nuisance which damaged their property.

Defendant filed a Motion for judgment on the pleadings which characterized plaintiffs' cause of action as an inverse condemnation action. Affidavits and other documents were filed in the record and the Trial Court agreed with the defendant that plaintiffs' action was based on inverse condemnation and the statute had run on that action. The Trial Judge also ruled that the statute had run on the nuisance claim.

On appeal, we affirm the Trial Judge's holding that plaintiffs' action was a nuisance type taking and was governed by the inverse condemnation statute, and we agree that the record demonstrates that the statute of limitations had run on plaintiffs' claims.

The full text of this opinion may be found on the TBA website at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TCA/2009/hplarge_122809.pdf

A dissenting opinion may be found on the TBA website at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TCA/2009/hplarge_DIS_122809.pdf