MICHAEL L. JOHNSON, ET AL. v. TODD FORD (Tenn. Ct. App. April 12, 2012)
Michael L. Johnson and Tammy K. Johnson (“Plaintiffs”) purchased from Todd Ford (“Defendant”) real property located in Athens, Tennessee containing a house constructed by Defendant (“the House”). Shortly after purchasing the House, Plaintiffs began to experience problems with a leaking and flooding basement.
Plaintiffs sued Defendant alleging, among other things, breach of contract, negligent construction, misrepresentation, and violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Prior to trial, the Trial Court partially granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment finding that Defendant had violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The Trial Court held, however, that whether the violation caused damages to Plaintiffs would be submitted to the jury for its determination.
After a jury trial, the Trial Court entered judgment upon the jury’s verdict finding and holding, inter alia, that Defendant breached the parties’ contract, and that Plaintiffs were awarded compensatory damages of $50,000 for the breach. The Trial Court also awarded Plaintiffs their attorney’s fees and discretionary costs.
Plaintiffs appeal to this Court raising issues regarding the jury’s failure to find in Plaintiffs’ favor with regard to the claims of misrepresentation, damages for Defendant’s violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, punitive damages, and rescission, among other things. We affirm.
Opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/johnsonm_041212.pdf
The Tennessee Construction Law Blog is published by David Headrick of the Adams Law Firm, a full-service law firm with offices in Knoxville and Nashville, Tennessee.
Showing posts with label Compensatory Damages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Compensatory Damages. Show all posts
April 20, 2012
Court reviews a Tennessee Consumer Protection Act claim and other claims in a case involving accusations of negligent construction
May 19, 2011
Court Reviews Whether a Contractor Violated the TN Consumer Protection Act by Hiding Unsuitable Soil
SPRING CRESS REALTY, LLC v. LARRY E. BROWN DBA S&B ASSOCIATES ET AL. (Tenn. Ct. App. May 16, 2011)
This is an action by an owner/developer of real property, Spring Cress Realty, LLC, against its excavation contractor, Larry E. Brown dba S&B Associates. The primary factual allegation is that the excavator intentionally hid approximately 40,000 cubic yards of unsuitable soil in an "engineered fill." The complaint included a claim that Brown violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act ("the TCPA"), Tenn. Code Ann. section 47-18-101 et seq.(2001). After a bench trial, the court awarded Spring Cress a judgment against Brown for compensatory damages of $551,295, trebled under the TCPA to $1,653,885. Brown appeals raising issues as to the preponderance of the evidence and the statute of limitations applicable to the TCPA claim. We affirm.
Opinion may be found at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TCA/2011/springcress_051611.pdf
This is an action by an owner/developer of real property, Spring Cress Realty, LLC, against its excavation contractor, Larry E. Brown dba S&B Associates. The primary factual allegation is that the excavator intentionally hid approximately 40,000 cubic yards of unsuitable soil in an "engineered fill." The complaint included a claim that Brown violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act ("the TCPA"), Tenn. Code Ann. section 47-18-101 et seq.(2001). After a bench trial, the court awarded Spring Cress a judgment against Brown for compensatory damages of $551,295, trebled under the TCPA to $1,653,885. Brown appeals raising issues as to the preponderance of the evidence and the statute of limitations applicable to the TCPA claim. We affirm.
Opinion may be found at:
http://www.tba2.org/tba_files/TCA/2011/springcress_051611.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)